Mosaid, and its Nokia patents, get acquired by PE firm
Sterling Partners pays $594m for Canadian IPR firm, which now bears cost of licensing and defending key Nokia and Microsoft patents
Published: 1 November, 2011
READ MORE: M&A | Canada | Patents/IPR
The wheelings and dealings behind the scenes of the wireless patents industry continue unabated, with InterDigital's huge IPR treasure chest still up for sale, and another player, Canada's Mosaid Technologies, falling to a private equity firm for C$590m ($594m). Mosaid would have been regarded as little more than a sideline patent troll until a deal, made in September, which gave it control of about 2,000 patents from Nokia and Microsoft.
Mosaid, which was the subject of a hostile bid from fellow Canadian troll Wi-Lan, will now become part of US-based Sterling Partners. Wi-Lan withdrew after Sterling trumped its C$42-per-share bid by $4 per share. Mosaid argued that the earlier offer undervalued it by not taking account of the Nokia/Microsoft deal, which was only concluded after Wi-Lan made its move and was seen by some as a deliberate blocking tactic. Any change in ownership of those 2,000 patents would have to be approved by the two larger companies. The patents include about 1,200 deemed 'essential to the GSM, W-CDMA and/or LTE standards, plus about 800 'wireless implementation' patents.
Transferring patents to third parties while retaining a measure of control has become a common practice in the wireless sector, offering some protection from lawsuits targeted directly at large players. "Nokia and Microsoft have agreed to deliver consent to change of control, allowing retention of Core Wireless portfolio by Mosaid," Sterling said in a statement. Mosaid paid nothing for the patents, but will bear the cost of licensing them to other companies (pocketing one-third of the value of such deals), and potentially also the cost of defending them in court. However, aggressors are less likely to sue a relatively small IPR holder than a deep-pocketed giant like Microsoft.
Mosaid says that the revenue from these patents could exceed the total takings it had made throughout its 35-year history, claiming that they are more valuable than those included in the $4.5bn package of Nortel IPR sold to a group including Apple and Microsoft. It expects its annual profit to double within three years from its current C$25m level. Both Nokia and Microsoft are among the largest holders of wireless and mobile software patents in the world, and their close alliance over WP7 potentially unites them in any IPR wars. Microsoft has been chasing Android OEMs for hefty licensing fees for its Linux-related patents, while Nokia recently won a favourable settlement of a dispute with Apple.
Another major wireless patent holder is InterDigital, which has been looking for buyers for its portfolio since the wave of Android lawsuits sparked off the recent scramble for IPR and consequent goldrush. However, interest in the assets was said to have declined once Google agreed to acquire Motorola Mobility, securing it the major IPR position it needed to defend Android from Apple, Microsoft and Oracle. Last week, announcing third quarter results, InterDigital said it was still weighing the possible sell-off.
Pages: 1 | 2
More M&A News
More CANADA News
- Verizon and AT&T looking for foreign buys? - Jun 18
- VimpelCom seeks buyer for Wind Canada? - Mar 25
- Rogers pushes NFC in Canada - Nov 5









Posted by staff on Tuesday 1st November, 2011
“Patent troll”
Call it what you will...patent hoarder, patent troll, non-practicing entity, shell company, etc. It all means one thing: “we’re using your invention and we’re not going to pay”. This is just dissembling by large infringers to kill any inventor support system. It is purely about legalizing theft.
Prior to eBay v Mercexchange, small entities had a viable chance at commercializing their inventions. If the defendant was found guilty, an injunction was most always issued. Then the inventor small entity could enjoy the exclusive use of his invention in commercializing it. Unfortunately, injunctions are often no longer available to small entity inventors because of the Supreme Court decision so we have no fair chance to compete with much larger entities who are now free to use our inventions. Essentially, large infringers now have your gun and all the bullets. Worse yet, inability to commercialize means those same small entities will not be hiring new employees to roll out their products and services. And now some of those same parties who killed injunctions for small entities and thus blocked their chance at commercializing now complain that small entity inventors are not commercializing. They created the problem and now they want to blame small entities for it. What dissembling! If you don’t like this state of affairs (your unemployment is running out), tell your Congress member. Then maybe we can get some sense back in the patent system with injunctions fully enforceable on all infringers by all inventors, large and small.
For the truth about trolls, please see http://truereform.piausa.org/default.html#pt.